The need for a clear set of goals is apparent although this process may fragment a loose coalition of interests -as Paul points out we should be open about identity. In that fragmented future world of digital inclusion we need champions and alliances not the current fiudge.

This feels like the start of a debate that will clarify goals and methods. With an election upon us and post-election cost constraint to follow – we need to take the time to work thorugh these issues and get ready for the challenges that might follow.

I have a pet hate of the use of the word ‘evolution’ – the implicit continuous improvement is not evidenced. I doubt that this is an evolutionary process, the internet and digital inclusion is being architected to achieve defined purposes; primarily commercial and governmental. The unintended consequences of this development may offer chances for innovation but we have to move beyond living off the virtual ‘waste-tip’ if we are to allow others to gain and grow. To do this the clarity of goals and means implied in Paul’s article will be essential – as will loud voices to champion them!